Agentic coding as a team
Two days with your engineering team: introduce Claude Code and Codex so the code passes review. On your own repository, with real tickets and shared rules that apply from the Monday after.
Two days with your engineering team: introduce Claude Code and Codex so the code passes review. On your own repository, with real tickets and shared rules that apply from the Monday after.
Claude Code, Codex, Copilot or Cursor have arrived in the team, but without a shared way of working. Some build agentically, some stay sceptical, product waits for results and wonders about the reviews. The training gets the whole team to one table, names the problems and builds the way of working where it has to hold: in your repository.
Every block ends with something your team keeps using.
Context, planning, specs and the limits of an agent. Live on your codebase, not on slides.
Everyone works through a real ticket with the agent. We compare approaches and write down what worked.
Shared rules for prompts, commits and reviews. Gates that catch what the agent gets wrong.
Repository setup, team playbook and the first three things you change on Monday. Handed over, not promised.
As Head of Engineering at Seobility I introduced AI workflows during running operations. I have taught at iba University of Cooperative Education and given seminars at GFU and other academies. I work with Claude Code and Codex myself every day.
Claude Code and Codex are the core. If your team works with Copilot or Cursor, we include them. The rules we agree on apply to every tool.
Both work. On site is better for the first day, remote works well for follow-ups. We decide based on your team.
Then we split into two groups or run the three-day Factory Workshop, which is designed for whole departments including product.
Both, also mixed, depending on how your team is set up.
Let's talk about your team and your repository. Free and non-binding, 30 minutes is enough for a first assessment.
Book a call